Where the market stood on 02 November 2026
A snapshot of the digital-asset market as of 02 November 2026, covering capitalisation, dominance, fee streams, and seven-day dispersion across assets above $1 billion.
Capitalisation and Dominance
As of 02 November 2026 (point-in-time), total market capitalisation stood at $2.616 trillion, a figure that reflects a −2.30% move over the preceding 24 hours. Within that aggregate, Bitcoin accounted for 59.96% of total capitalisation and Ether for 10.70%, meaning the two largest assets together represented roughly 70.66% of the whole. Stablecoins outstanding reached $305.1 billion, or approximately 11.7% of total market capitalisation, while value locked across chains came to $85.9 billion—a subset of the total that reflects only assets committed to on-chain protocols, not the broader float.
Breadth of the Seven-Day Move
Among assets with market capitalisations above $1 billion, the trailing 7-day return distribution was notably wide. The five strongest performers in that cohort ranged from Hyperliquid (+11.83%) down to OKB (+4.41%), while the five weakest ranged from Bitway (−38.44%) to MemeCore (−11.34%). The gap between the top and bottom of this sample—roughly 50 percentage points over a single week—indicates that the 24-hour aggregate decline was not uniform; some assets in the same size tier moved sharply in the opposite direction. This dispersion does not, by itself, indicate whether the divergence was driven by asset-specific events, sector rotation, or liquidity differences.
Fee Streams Versus Capitalisation Ranking
The eight largest annualised fee streams (annualized from trailing 30 days to 02 November 2026) are led by Uniswap at $1.043 billion, followed by Lido DAO ($702.4 million), Canton ($594.4 million), Aave ($466.9 million), Meteora ($328.1 million), Morpho ($305.9 million), TRON ($289.8 million), and Ethereum ($265.3 million). Several of these protocols do not appear near the top of the capitalisation ranking, and at least one—Morpho—appears simultaneously in both the fee-stream table and the strongest seven-day performers list. The fee figures describe economic throughput as proxied by one revenue-adjacent metric; they do not capture how fees are distributed between token holders, liquidity providers, and treasuries, nor do they account for costs, token emissions, or balance-sheet considerations. A high annualised fee stream therefore describes activity, not profitability or value accrual to any specific stakeholder.
What These Figures Cannot Capture
Market-wide aggregates of this kind compress substantial heterogeneity. They do not distinguish between spot and derivative volume, between organic and wash-traded activity, or between protocol usage driven by incentive programmes and usage driven by unsubsidised demand. The dominance percentages reflect only tracked capitalisation and will vary with the scope of the underlying asset universe. Cross-chain value locked figures depend on the methodology used to avoid double-counting collateral. None of these figures incorporate off-chain or centralised-exchange-held positions, which represent a material share of overall exposure.
A reader seeking to contextualise these numbers would next need to examine individual asset-level data, protocol revenue-sharing mechanics, and the composition of the stablecoin outstanding figure by issuer and chain.