Rankings
Fourteen ordered lists, each measuring one thing. Every board carries a note on what it does not measure, because a leaderboard without that note is an implied recommendation.
Price multiplied by the units a data provider believes are circulating. It ranks size, not quality, liquidity or the amount of money that ever entered the asset.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
1.55T |
| 2 |
|
291.99B |
| 3 |
|
183.34B |
| 4 |
|
91.55B |
| 5 |
|
84.83B |
| 6 |
|
73.69B |
| 7 |
|
58.37B |
| 8 |
|
30.82B |
| 9 |
|
22.40B |
| 10 |
|
18.21B |
| 11 |
|
13.81B |
| 12 |
|
12.74B |
| 13 |
|
11.87B |
| 14 |
|
9.83B |
| 15 |
|
9.41B |
| 16 |
|
8.50B |
| 17 |
|
8.36B |
| 18 |
|
8.32B |
| 19 |
|
7.47B |
| 20 |
|
6.07B |
Annualized from the trailing 30 days. Fees are what users paid to use a network or application — before any split between the protocol and the parties serving them.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
$1.35B |
| 2 |
|
$594.32M |
| 3 |
|
$499.55M |
| 4 |
|
$428.76M |
| 5 |
|
$390.34M |
| 6 |
|
$315.25M |
| 7 |
|
$270.82M |
| 8 |
|
$219.10M |
| 9 |
|
$216.67M |
| 10 |
|
$213.83M |
| 11 |
|
$197.06M |
| 12 |
|
$194.03M |
| 13 |
|
$154.78M |
| 14 |
|
$127.28M |
| 15 |
|
$126.53M |
| 16 |
|
$124.36M |
| 17 |
|
$118.93M |
| 18 |
|
$87.31M |
| 19 |
|
$80.94M |
| 20 |
|
$63.57M |
The share of fees retained by the protocol rather than paid out to suppliers of the service. It is not profit, and it is not a claim any holder can enforce.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
$594.32M |
| 2 |
|
$315.25M |
| 3 |
|
$127.28M |
| 4 |
|
$124.36M |
| 5 |
|
$111.77M |
| 6 |
|
$84.00M |
| 7 |
|
$75.39M |
| 8 |
|
$54.54M |
| 9 |
|
$54.35M |
| 10 |
|
$40.47M |
| 11 |
|
$39.03M |
| 12 |
|
$38.08M |
| 13 |
|
$33.04M |
| 14 |
|
$31.02M |
| 15 |
|
$30.74M |
| 16 |
|
$26.17M |
| 17 |
|
$25.60M |
| 18 |
|
$24.18M |
| 19 |
|
$23.66M |
| 20 |
|
$23.61M |
The dollar value of assets deposited in a chain's or protocol's contracts. It moves with the price of what is deposited, not only with deposits and withdrawals.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
$48.52B |
| 2 |
|
$29.41B |
| 3 |
|
$23.46B |
| 4 |
|
$17.80B |
| 5 |
|
$12.62B |
| 6 |
|
$9.53B |
| 7 |
|
$7.14B |
| 8 |
|
$6.66B |
| 9 |
|
$6.37B |
| 10 |
|
$5.71B |
| 11 |
|
$5.47B |
| 12 |
|
$5.27B |
| 13 |
|
$5.20B |
| 14 |
|
$5.15B |
| 15 |
|
$4.71B |
| 16 |
|
$4.15B |
| 17 |
|
$3.46B |
| 18 |
|
$3.46B |
| 19 |
|
$3.06B |
| 20 |
|
$2.39B |
Value swapped through decentralized exchanges over the last 30 days. Wash trading and multi-hop routing inflate this figure, particularly for smaller assets.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
$54.81B |
| 2 |
|
$6.25B |
| 3 |
|
$4.68B |
| 4 |
|
$3.88B |
| 5 |
|
$1.43B |
| 6 |
|
$1.25B |
| 7 |
|
$946.22M |
| 8 |
|
$537.65M |
| 9 |
|
$507.48M |
| 10 |
|
$470.27M |
| 11 |
|
$437.18M |
| 12 |
|
$239.44M |
| 13 |
|
$234.36M |
| 14 |
|
$162.12M |
| 15 |
|
$127.72M |
| 16 |
|
$107.40M |
| 17 |
|
$77.13M |
| 18 |
|
$65.86M |
| 19 |
|
$34.98M |
| 20 |
|
$34.17M |
Distinct addresses active on the most recent full day, where a source publishes it. An address is not a person, and one person routinely controls many.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
626,289 |
| 2 |
|
506,462 |
| 3 |
|
462,429 |
| 4 |
|
452,516 |
| 5 |
|
134,021 |
| 6 |
|
37,030 |
| 7 |
|
24,778 |
| 8 |
|
19,665 |
| 9 |
|
5,722 |
| 10 |
|
3,012 |
| 11 |
|
2,649 |
| 12 |
|
1,247 |
| 13 |
|
529 |
| 14 |
|
411 |
| 15 |
|
255 |
Stablecoins issued on or bridged to this network. A demand measure that does not depend on the network's own token price.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
$162.20B |
| 2 |
|
$93.24B |
| 3 |
|
$15.50B |
| 4 |
|
$13.89B |
| 5 |
|
$6.84B |
| 6 |
|
$4.29B |
| 7 |
|
$3.13B |
| 8 |
|
$1.45B |
| 9 |
|
$1.21B |
| 10 |
|
$1.13B |
| 11 |
|
$857.07M |
| 12 |
|
$852.55M |
| 13 |
|
$775.52M |
| 14 |
|
$758.15M |
| 15 |
|
$580.90M |
| 16 |
|
$463.42M |
| 17 |
|
$422.71M |
| 18 |
|
$402.72M |
| 19 |
|
$302.71M |
| 20 |
|
$206.79M |
Value of the asset held inside US-listed exchange-traded products whose dominant holding is the asset itself. Non-US listings are outside our coverage.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
$98.49B |
| 2 |
|
$14.77B |
| 3 |
|
$1.23B |
| 4 |
|
$907.30M |
| 5 |
|
$173.39M |
| 6 |
|
$60.14M |
| 7 |
|
$23.53M |
| 8 |
|
$7.58M |
| 9 |
|
$5.49M |
Disclosed holdings on the balance sheets of publicly traded companies. Private holders, funds and sovereigns are not counted.
The proportion of supply committed to securing the network. Unbonding rules differ, so the same percentage means different things about how quickly that supply could be sold.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+69.20% |
The observed staking rate less annual issuance. It shows what staking earns relative to the whole supply, not the headline rate.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+1.34% |
Commits published to the project's public repositories over four weeks. Commit counts measure activity, not quality, and reward projects that commit in small pieces.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
567 |
| 2 |
|
219 |
| 3 |
|
171 |
| 4 |
|
135 |
| 5 |
|
108 |
| 6 |
|
106 |
| 7 |
|
103 |
| 8 |
|
98 |
| 9 |
|
92 |
| 10 |
|
87 |
| 11 |
|
86 |
| 12 |
|
41 |
| 13 |
|
34 |
| 14 |
|
34 |
| 15 |
|
23 |
| 16 |
|
21 |
| 17 |
|
19 |
| 18 |
|
19 |
| 19 |
|
19 |
| 20 |
|
16 |
Price change over the trailing twelve months. Assets that did not exist a year ago cannot appear, which makes any list like this survivorship-biased by construction.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+3,720.40% |
| 2 |
|
+1,858.40% |
| 3 |
|
+479.40% |
| 4 |
|
+307.90% |
| 5 |
|
+211.10% |
| 6 |
|
+92.30% |
| 7 |
|
+85.50% |
| 8 |
|
+85.30% |
| 9 |
|
+66.90% |
| 10 |
|
+34.60% |
| 11 |
|
+27.50% |
| 12 |
|
+24.10% |
| 13 |
|
+23.90% |
| 14 |
|
+23.70% |
| 15 |
|
+11.00% |
| 16 |
|
+6.20% |
| 17 |
|
+5.30% |
| 18 |
|
+3.70% |
| 19 |
|
+3.60% |
| 20 |
|
+3.40% |
Distance from the highest price the asset ever recorded in our price source. It says nothing about whether the earlier price was justified.
| # | Asset | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
-99.98% |
| 2 |
|
-99.66% |
| 3 |
|
-99.64% |
| 4 |
|
-98.42% |
| 5 |
|
-98.30% |
| 6 |
|
-97.68% |
| 7 |
|
-97.65% |
| 8 |
|
-97.41% |
| 9 |
|
-97.11% |
| 10 |
|
-97.11% |
| 11 |
|
-97.01% |
| 12 |
|
-96.92% |
| 13 |
|
-96.85% |
| 14 |
|
-96.76% |
| 15 |
|
-96.69% |
| 16 |
|
-95.87% |
| 17 |
|
-95.70% |
| 18 |
|
-95.65% |
| 19 |
|
-95.58% |
| 20 |
|
-95.51% |