Where the market stood on 05 November 2026
A snapshot of digital-asset market structure as of 05 November 2026, covering concentration, weekly dispersion, and annualised fee streams.
Market Concentration
As of 05 November 2026, total market capitalisation stood at $2.71 trillion (point-in-time). Bitcoin alone accounted for 59.52% of that figure, while Ether contributed a further 10.88%, meaning the two largest assets together represented roughly 70 percentage points of the total. The remaining share was distributed across all other listed assets, stablecoins outstanding of $302.1 billion (point-in-time), and value locked across chains of $85.2 billion (point-in-time). These figures describe a market in which a small number of assets account for the substantial majority of recorded value, with the long tail absorbing the remainder.
Breadth of Weekly Movement
The 24-hour market-capitalisation change registered +0.26% (point-in-time), offering only a narrow window into directional movement. Over the trailing 7 days, the dispersion between the strongest and weakest performers among assets above $1 billion in capitalisation was wide. The five strongest included Uniswap (+8.22%), Monero (+7.66%), POL ex-MATIC (+6.92%), Canton (+6.73%), and Quant (+6.28%). At the other end, Bitway (−41.57%), MemeCore (−20.06%), Worldcoin (−9.11%), Rain (−9.06%), and World Liberty Financial (−8.96%) recorded the steepest declines over the same trailing 7 days. The 50-percentage-point spread between the top and bottom performers indicates that weekly returns were not uniform across assets of comparable scale; the aggregate index-level figure obscures significant cross-sectional variation.
Fee Streams Relative to Capitalisation Ranking
Among the largest annualised fee streams (annualised from the trailing 30 days to 05 November 2026), Uniswap led at approximately $1.01 billion, followed by Lido DAO at $694 million, Canton at $594 million, Aave at $482 million, Morpho at $313 million, TRON at $303 million, Meteora at $290 million, and Ethereum at $260 million. Several of these names do not appear near the top of the capitalisation table, while assets with the largest market capitalisations — Bitcoin in particular — do not feature in this fee list at all. That gap reflects a difference in the economic activity each network or protocol captures, but it does not on its own indicate whether fee generation is high or low relative to any given asset's scale; a reader would need each asset's market capitalisation alongside its fee figure to construct any ratio, and this dataset does not supply the per-asset capitalisation breakdown necessary for that calculation.
What These Figures Cannot Capture
Market-wide aggregates of this kind describe recorded on-chain or exchange-reported activity and do not reflect off-chain trading volumes, over-the-counter flows, derivatives open interest, the distribution of holders within each asset, leverage levels across the ecosystem, regulatory developments, or the degree to which stablecoin outstanding figures represent active versus dormant supply. The total value locked figure aggregates across chains using methodologies that may differ by source, and double-counting across protocols sharing collateral is a known measurement challenge not resolved by the headline number alone.
A reader seeking to extend this analysis would next need to examine per-asset capitalisation figures alongside their respective fee and volume data to place concentration and activity metrics in proportion to one another.