Inside the Exchange-based Tokens sector, 30 October 2026
The Exchange-based Tokens sector held a combined market cap of roughly $157.5 bn across 52 constituents as of 30 October 2026.
Sector Snapshot: Exchange-based Tokens
As of 30 October 2026, the Exchange-based Tokens sector tracked 52 constituents with a combined market capitalisation of $157.51 bn. Concentration is pronounced: the single largest member, BNB, carried a market cap of $92.73 bn, equivalent to roughly 59% of the entire sector total. The next four members by size — Hyperliquid ($21.90 bn), WhiteBIT Coin ($8.84 bn), LEO Token ($8.67 bn), and Uniswap ($4.18 bn) — together account for a further 27%, meaning the top five constituents represent approximately 86% of reported sector capitalisation. The remaining members, including the ten further names shown in the data, divide a comparatively small residual.
Fee Stream Coverage
Of the 15 largest members listed, nine carry a reported annualised fee figure derived from the trailing 30 days to 30 October 2026, while six return a null value for that field (WhiteBIT Coin, LEO Token, Pump.fun, Aster, HTX DAO, and NEXO). Among those with measurable fee streams, the figures span several orders of magnitude — from less than $1,000 annualised (Cronos at $620.50; KuCoin at $596.65) to over $1.09 bn (Uniswap). The absence of fee data for roughly 40% of the displayed members limits any uniform economic comparison across the group using this metric alone.
Distance from All-Time Highs
The spread of drawdown from individual all-time highs is wide across the 15 members shown. The smallest recorded distance belongs to Hyperliquid at –6.69% below its all-time high as of the trailing 7-day period to 30 October 2026, while the largest distances are held by Cronos (–94.23%) and Jupiter (–87.28%). Several other constituents sit between –75% and –85% below their respective peaks, including Uniswap (–85.11%), Bitget Token (–78.50%), and KuCoin (–75.49%). These figures reflect each token's distance from its own historical maximum and are not comparable across assets as a measure of relative standing.
What the Sector Label Does and Does Not Convey
The label Exchange-based Tokens groups assets that have some organisational or functional association with trading venues or exchange ecosystems, but the category contains meaningfully different instrument types. Centralised exchange tokens (such as OKB, Bitget Token, KuCoin, and Gate) differ structurally from decentralised-protocol tokens (such as Uniswap and Jupiter), which in turn differ from lending-platform tokens (NEXO) or token-launchpad tokens (Pump.fun). Fee streams, where reported, arise from distinct mechanisms — protocol swap fees, platform revenue sharing, or other sources — making direct cross-asset fee comparisons methodologically cautious territory. The sector classification therefore signals a thematic grouping rather than a guarantee of economic or structural homogeneity among constituents. Readers should treat the 52-member aggregate figures as a descriptive summary of a heterogeneous collection rather than a proxy for any single business model.