Digital Asset Database Digital asset research & education
BTC$77,903+0.47% ETH$2,408-0.54% USDT$0.9996-0.01% BNB$698.19+1.45% XRP$1.37+1.63% USDC$0.9998+0.00% SOL$100.79+0.75% TRX$0.3262+0.94% FIGR_HELOC$1.01-2.00% HYPE$82.20-0.55% ZEC$831.29-0.47% DOGE$0.0832+1.64% RAIN$0.0167-1.08% USDS$0.9997-0.01% XMR$513.87-1.13% LEO$9.30+0.18% WBT$71.34+0.02% LINK$11.24+0.04% ADA$0.2061+4.48% XLM$0.1769+1.03% BCH$250.98+1.28% DAI$0.9998+0.01% CC$0.1099-3.17% USDE$0.9994-0.01% USD1$0.9994+0.00% LTC$50.42+2.27% GRAM$1.34+1.30% UNI$5.74-9.40% HBAR$0.0761+2.70% USDG$1.00+0.02% SUI$0.7726+6.47% AVAX$7.29+0.93%
菜单
首页
资产 全部资产板块排名Heat map筛选器对比资产★ Saved
基本面 Fees & revenue锁定价值Exchange volume网络活动StablecoinsStaking & yield
估值 估值比率Supply & issuance指标定义
机构 交易所交易产品企业资产负债表
研究 研究笔记事件日历风险框架安全事件
学习 Learn library术语表计算工具方法论数据来源数据新鲜度AI agents公开 API
资讯 查询数据 全球市场 关于我们
阅读选项
Photography CryptoStudio
引导视图

市场新手——价格、收益率、market cap?我们在您浏览时逐一解释每个术语,语言简明直白。数据相同,内置辅助说明。

专家观点

您已了解市场。仅呈现数据——简洁、快速、紧凑,无多余说明。此为默认视图。

浅色或深色
语言
公开 API

本站所有数据均可通过 JSON 获取,并附带期间与来源信息。

阅读 API 文档
Governance 风险 defilayer1layer2nftstablecoin

Whale Voting Concentration

Voting power is proportional to tokens held, so a few large holders can determine outcomes regardless of how many other participants disagree.

运作方式

One token one vote means governance ownership mirrors token distribution, and early allocations to a team, a foundation, and private investors often retain their voting rights even where they are still subject to transfer restrictions. Custodians add a second layer, because tokens deposited by customers sit in addresses the venue controls and can in principle be voted by the venue. Delegation concentrates further, since most holders who participate at all delegate to a small set of well-known delegates. Vote-incentive markets formalize the arrangement by letting third parties pay holders to direct their votes, which turns governance influence into something openly purchasable.

实际可观测的内容

Look at the distribution of voting power across the top delegates and holders, and compute how many addresses are needed to reach a majority of a typical vote, which is a governance analogue of a concentration coefficient. Check whether custodial addresses have ever voted, and whether any vote-incentive market exists for the asset. Reviewing which addresses decided each past proposal is the direct test and is fully public.

先例

In 2020 an attempt to control the Steem network's on-chain governance using stake held at exchanges led part of the community to fork the chain into Hive, showing that custodial balances can become votes.

哪些因素使其更重要或更不重要

Consider how many addresses constitute a majority of typical turnout, whether insider allocations vote, whether custodians vote customer tokens, and whether a vote-incentive market operates.

01

相关因素

Float Manipulation Market A small tradable share of supply sets the reference price for a much larger total, and whoever controls the…
Low-Turnout Governance Governance Token votes decide protocol parameters, but only a small share of tokens usually votes, so a modest holding…
Foundation Discretion and Off-Chain Decisions Governance Decisions are made by a foundation, core developers, or private discussion, with token voting confirming…
Custodian Single Point of Failure Counterparty One custodian, one signing arrangement, or one operations team stands between holders and their assets, so a…
02

适用资产范围

本因素适用类别中规模最大的资产。出现在此处,意味着该因素与此类资产相关,而非表示相关情况已经发生。

BitcoinEthereumTetherXRPUSDCSolanaTRONHyperliquidZcashDogecoin

资产

全部资产板块排名Heat map筛选器对比已保存

基本面

Fees & revenue锁定价值Exchange volume网络活动StablecoinsStaking & yield

Valuation & risk

估值比率Supply & issuance指标定义风险框架安全事件

机构

交易所交易产品企业资产负债表Events研究笔记资讯

学习

Learn library术语表计算工具查询数据AI agents公开 API

关于

关于我们联系方法论数据来源编辑政策数据新鲜度

法律

免责声明使用条款Privacy policy