BTC$80,321-1.21% ETH$2,337-2.53% USDT$0.9991+0.00% BNB$732.42-1.05% XRP$1.29-1.08% USDC$0.9996-0.01% SOL$101.29-2.31% TRX$0.3290-0.26% FIGR_HELOC$1.05+2.32% ZEC$1,194-2.40% HYPE$76.07-2.01% DOGE$0.0771-2.65% XMR$602.59+2.33% USDS$1.00+0.02% WBT$77.41-1.99% LINK$11.52-3.18% LEO$9.03+0.02% ADA$0.2059-3.79% XLM$0.1703-2.43% RAIN$0.008304+0.33% NEAR$4.43-7.51% BCH$274.42-3.29% USDE$0.9996+0.01% DAI$1.00+0.01% LTC$56.68-2.08% UNI$6.77-4.35% CC$0.1009-1.89% USD1$0.9990+0.01% AVAX$8.89-2.68% SUI$0.9289-4.75% GRAM$1.25-3.67% HBAR$0.0775-0.95%
Menu
Home
Assets
Coverage
All assetsEvery research file, largest firstSectorsWhat each category holds and weighsRankingsFourteen leaderboards and what they missHeat mapThe market sized by value, shaded by changeGlobal marketTotal capitalization, dominance and volume
Tools
ScreenerFilter by fundamentals, supply and riskCompare assetsResearch files side by sideSavedThe assets you have starred
Fundamentals
Economics
Fees & revenueWhat users pay, and who keeps itValue lockedCapital deposited in each networkExchange volumeTrading on decentralized exchanges
Networks
Network activityAddresses, transactions and throughputStablecoinsDollar tokens, where they live and what backs themStaking & yieldWhat securing a network pays, after issuance
Valuation
Standardized measures
Valuation ratiosPrice against fees and revenue, limits statedSupply & issuanceCirculating, maximum and the dilution aheadMetric definitionsEvery figure: definition, period, limitation
Institutional
Regulated access
Exchange-traded productsEvery US-listed fund, with a page eachCorporate treasuriesListed companies holding digital assets
Research
Analysis
Research notesShort notes written from stored figuresEvents calendarUpgrades, halvings and policy dates
Risk
Risk frameworkFifty factors in seven familiesSecurity incidentsExploits and failures, with the losses
Learn
Education
Learn libraryEleven tracks, from first principlesGlossaryEvery term in plain EnglishCalculatorsFee drag, dilution and conversion
How this site works
MethodologyHow every figure is measuredData sourcesWho publishes what we showData freshnessWhen each feed last ranAI agentsPrompts that keep an assistant on our dataPublic APIThe same figures, as JSON
News Ask the data About us
Reading options
Guided view

New to markets — prices, yields, market cap? We explain every term as you browse, in plain English. Same data, with the help built in.

Expert view

You already know the market. Just the data — clean, fast and compact, with no extra explanations. This is the default view.

View
Light or dark
Language
Photography PhotographyStill lifeCryptoStudio
Public API

Every figure on this site is available as JSON, with its period and source attached.

Read the API docs
Fundamentals Take Rate percent

Take Rate (Revenue Share of Fees)

The share of total user fees the protocol keeps instead of paying out to liquidity providers or validators.

Take rate expresses the fee split as a single percentage: total fees at the bottom, retained protocol revenue at the top. A decentralized exchange that sends most of each swap fee to liquidity providers has a low take rate; a protocol with no supply side to compensate can retain everything. It describes how a protocol is configured, and it is normally set by an explicit parameter in the contracts.

How it is computed

(protocol revenue over the last 30 days / protocol fees over the last 30 days) x 100

Where it misleads

In most cases this is a governance parameter rather than an outcome, so it reveals a design choice and not operating efficiency. It reads near zero for blockchains that pass all gas to validators and near one hundred percent for protocols with no supply side, and neither reading is comparable to the other as performance. Where the numerator and denominator are produced by different adapters or sampled at different timestamps, the ratio can exceed one hundred percent or turn negative, which is a data artifact. Protocols that compensate suppliers with newly issued tokens instead of fees show a high take rate precisely because the cost was moved off the fee line.

The equity comparison, and why it fails

Gross margin, or a marketplace take rate. The analogy fails because no cost structure sits behind it: it is a splitting rule written into a smart contract that token holders can vote to change at any time.

Reading a high or a low value

A high value means a large share of fees is retained at the protocol level and a low value means most fees flow to suppliers. Read it as a description of the fee split rather than as a measure of quality.

01

Highest values in our coverage

Ordered by the figure alone. This is not a ranking of quality and carries no view.

#AssetTake Rate (Revenue Share of Fees)
1 SoSoValueSOSO 100.21%
2 Venice TokenVVV 100.00%
3 InjectiveINJ 100.00%
4 AvalancheAVAX 100.00%
5 Internet ComputerICP 100.00%
6 StellarXLM 100.00%
7 THORChainRUNE 100.00%
8 OKBOKB 100.00%
9 SeiSEI 100.00%
10 MantleMNT 100.00%
11 Ethereum Name ServiceENS 100.00%
12 HyperliquidHYPE 100.00%
13 FilecoinFIL 100.00%
14 Collector CryptCARDS 100.00%
15 AlgorandALGO 100.00%
Digital Asset DatabaseDigital asset research & education

Assets

All assetsSectorsRankingsHeat mapScreenerCompareSaved

Fundamentals

Fees & revenueValue lockedExchange volumeNetwork activityStablecoinsStaking & yield

Valuation & risk

Valuation ratiosSupply & issuanceMetric definitionsRisk frameworkSecurity incidents

Institutional

Exchange-traded productsCorporate treasuriesEventsResearch notesNews

Learn

Learn libraryGlossaryCalculatorsAsk the dataAI agentsPublic API

About

About usContactMethodologyData sourcesEditorial policyData freshness

Legal

DisclaimersTerms of usePrivacy policy