Where the market stood on 28 September 2026

Market Concentration

As of 28 September 2026, the total market capitalisation stood at $2.83 trillion (point-in-time). Within that aggregate, Bitcoin accounted for 58.72% of total capitalisation and Ether for a further 11.38%, meaning the two largest assets together represented roughly 70.1% of the measured universe. Stablecoins outstanding added $314.7 billion — approximately 11.1% of total market capitalisation — a share large enough to affect how raw capitalisation figures should be read, since stablecoins do not behave as risk assets in the conventional sense. Value locked across chains came to $94.8 billion, a figure that describes collateral and liquidity committed to on-chain protocols rather than free-float market value, and should not be added to or conflated with market capitalisation.

Breadth of Weekly Movement

The 24-hour change in total market capitalisation was -4.49% (point-in-time), suggesting a notable single-day contraction. Among assets with market capitalisations above $1 billion, the trailing 7-day return distribution was wide. On the upside, Quant posted +312.80% over the trailing 7 days — a reading far removed from every other entry in the table — followed by Bitway at +90.76%, Sui at +22.75%, Canton at +21.32%, and Ethena at +21.08%. On the downside, MemeCore fell -24.60%, Venice Token -16.21%, Monero -13.92%, Lighter -12.73%, and Rain -10.67% over the same trailing 7-day period. The spread between the strongest and weakest observations exceeds 330 percentage points, indicating that the weekly move was highly dispersed rather than uniform across the large-cap tier.

Fee Streams Versus Capitalisation Rank

The largest annualised fee streams, annualized from the trailing 30 days to 28 September 2026, are led by Uniswap at $2.53 billion, Pons at $1.78 billion, Lido DAO at $610.1 million, Canton at $592.7 million, Raydium at $507.1 million, Aave at $446.8 million, Meteora at $361.4 million, and STONK at $295.9 million. Several of these protocols do not appear among the dominant capitalisation holders named above. That gap illustrates a structural feature of the market: fee generation reflects current throughput and usage, while market capitalisation reflects the price of a token multiplied by its supply. The two measures can diverge materially when a token's float, inflation schedule, or investor pricing differs substantially from the revenue its underlying protocol produces. Neither figure validates or invalidates the other; they answer different questions about a protocol's activity and valuation basis.

What These Figures Cannot Capture

Market-wide aggregates of this kind do not convey the distribution of holders, the liquidity depth behind any quoted price, the legal or regulatory status of any asset, counterparty exposure within fee-generating protocols, or the methodological choices — such as which assets are included or how prices are sourced — that different data providers apply differently. A single-day capitalisation change also does not distinguish between price movement and supply changes.

A reader seeking to interpret these figures more fully would need to examine individual asset liquidity profiles, on-chain supply data, and the fee-accounting methodology applied by each protocol in the table.