バリュエーション

バリュエーション指標

資産の価値とその生産量との間の標準化された比率です。すべての資産に同一の方法で算出されるため比較が可能ですが、株式の倍率指標とは異なり、その差異は表面的なものではありません。

表を読む前にお読みください。 Tokenは株式ではありません。統合された法人も、監査済み会計も、いかなるfeeの流れに対する法的請求権も存在しません。Protocolのfee配分はガバナンス上の選択であり、投票によって変更される可能性があります。Market capitalizationは、しばしば自己申告に基づく流通supply数値に依存しています。ここに示す各ratioは、二つの公表数値間のスケール確認にすぎません――それ以上でも以下でもなく、資産が割安か割高かを示すものでは決してありません。バリュエーショントラックで各項目を正しく解説している →

すべて Layer 1 Layer 2 DeFi Stablecoins Liquid staking Exchange tokens Real-world assets Oracles Bridges Privacy Payments AI & DePIN Gaming & NFT Meme Wrapped Infrastructure その他

#	資産	時価総額	MC / fees	時価総額 / 収益	FDV / fees	FDV / 収益	MC / TVL	アドレス当たりMC	手数料利回り	Revenue yield	保有者利回り	今後の希薄化
1	RenderRENDER	$953.53M	210.7×	210.7×	216.7×	216.7×	—	—	0.47%	0.47%	0.45%	2.8%
2	Ethereum Name ServiceENS	$233.39M	85.1×	85.1×	201.2×	201.2×	—	—	1.18%	1.18%	—	136.5%
3	Axie InfinityAXS	$178.66M	108.3×	111.3×	166.5×	171.2×	—	—	0.92%	0.90%	—	53.8%
4	GeodnetGEOD	$116.76M	10.6×	10.6×	21.3×	21.3×	—	—	9.43%	9.43%	7.54%	101.2%
5	Fren PetFP	$38.90M	—	—	—	—	313.41×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
6	Magic EdenME	$37.57M	—	—	—	—	257.17×	—	—	—	—	61.1%
7	AukiAUKI	$32.73M	537.6×	537.6×	1,042×	1,042×	—	—	0.19%	0.19%	0.19%	93.9%
8	BlurBLUR	$28.85M	—	—	—	—	1.62×	—	0.00%	0.00%	—	3.0%
9	IlluviumILV	$27.60M	743.8×	743.8×	861.3×	861.3×	—	—	0.13%	0.13%	—	15.8%

直近30日間からannualize；時価総額はpoint-in-time site calculation from CoinGecko and DeFiLlama inputs observed 18 Oct 2026 07:04 UTC

各指標の定義と、その限界

Market Cap / Annualized Fees Compares a token's market value with the fees users paid to the network over a year. Providers disagree on what a fee is: priority tips and maximal extractable value are counted by some and excluded by others, and front-end interface fees taken by a separate company are usually invisible entirely. Assets that charge almost… annualized from trailing 30 days

Market Cap / Annualized Revenue Market value divided by the share of yearly fees the protocol keeps rather than paying out. The split between fees and revenue is a modeling choice, not an observation, and providers draw it in different places for the same protocol, so two reputable sites can differ by a multiple on the same token. The cost of earning that… annualized from trailing 30 days

FDV / Annualized Fees Like the market cap version, but values every token that will ever exist at today's price. There is no single definition of fully diluted supply: some providers use the coded maximum, some use current total supply, and some use supply after all published vesting completes, so the same token can carry three different FDVs. Assets… annualized from trailing 30 days

FDV / Annualized Revenue Fully diluted market value divided by the yearly fee income the protocol retains. Both inputs are estimates, so the errors compound: a provider that defines fully diluted supply generously and revenue narrowly will report a multiple several times another provider's for the identical protocol. Projects still distributing… annualized from trailing 30 days

Market Cap / TVL Compares a token's market value with the value of assets currently deposited in its contracts. Total value locked double-counts routinely: ether staked through a liquid staking provider produces a receipt token, which is deposited into a lending market, borrowed against, and redeposited, and each leg can be counted. Because it is… point-in-time

FDV / TVL Fully diluted market value divided by the value of assets deposited in the protocol. It inherits every problem of both inputs at once: recursive double-counting in deposits and an undefined or provider-specific diluted supply. Protocols that attracted deposits with token emissions are the common case here, and those same… point-in-time

Market Cap per Active Address Market value divided by the number of addresses that sent or received anything recently. Addresses are not users in either direction: one person can generate an unlimited number of addresses for free, while a single exchange deposit address can serve millions of customers whose trades never touch the chain. Rollups, batching… point-in-time value over trailing 30 days of activity

Fee Yield Total yearly fees paid by users, expressed as a percentage of the token's market value. Gross fees include amounts that never accrue to the protocol or to token holders in any form, so a high figure can coexist with a protocol that retains nothing. Fees paid to validators or liquidity providers are compensation for a cost… annualized from trailing 30 days

Network Revenue Yield Yearly protocol revenue expressed as a percentage of the token's market value. Nothing is distributed in the great majority of cases, so the figure describes revenue that stays with a treasury, with validators, or is destroyed by a burn mechanism rather than paid out. Where value does reach holders it arrives as… annualized from trailing 30 days

Holder Revenue Yield The share of fee income that actually reaches token holders, as a percentage of market value. A burn reaches holders only as a proportional supply reduction, and it can be entirely offset by issuance elsewhere in the same protocol, which this figure does not net off. Fee distributions to stakers are received only by tokens that are… annualized from trailing 30 days

Dilution overhang How much larger fully diluted valuation is than market capitalization. Fully diluted valuation prices tokens that do not yet trade at the price of tokens that do, which is an assumption, not a measurement. For assets with very long emission schedules the arithmetic is close to meaningless. point-in-time

NVT (Network Value to Transactions) Network value divided by the daily value moved on-chain, smoothed over about three months. The denominator counts change outputs, self-transfers, and exchange rebalancing as settlement, and the adjustment heuristics used to remove them differ enough between providers that NVT values from two sites are not comparable. The measure… point-in-time value over a smoothed 90-day denominator

バリュエーション指標

各指標の定義と、その限界

資産

ファンダメンタルズ

Valuation & risk

機関投資家

学ぶ

概要

法律