Digital asset valuation ratios | Digital Asset Database

阅读表格前请先读此内容。 Token 不是股票。不存在合并主体、经审计的财务报表，也不存在对任何费用流的可执行权利。Protocol 的费用分配是一种治理选择，可经投票更改。市值依赖于流通供应量数据，而该数据通常为自行报告。此处每项比率都是两个公开数据之间的量级参照——仅此而已，绝非关于某资产是否便宜或昂贵的判断。估值轨迹对每一项均有详细说明 →

全部 Layer 1 Layer 2 DeFi Stablecoins Liquid staking Exchange tokens Real-world assets Oracles Privacy Payments AI & DePIN Gaming & NFT Meme Wrapped Infrastructure 其他

#	资产	市值	MC / 费用	市值 / 收入	FDV / 费用	FDV / 收入	MC / TVL	每地址市值	费用收益率	收入收益率	持有者收益	待发稀释
1	BitcoinBTC	$1.56T	19,246×	—	19,246×	—	375.59×	$3.08M	0.01%	—	—	0.0%
2	EthereumETH	$292.80B	2,309×	9,506×	2,309×	9,506×	6.02×	$466,576	0.04%	0.01%	—	0.0%
3	XRPXRP	$85.63B	—	—	—	—	2,098×	—	—	—	—	59.4%
4	SolanaSOL	$58.73B	216.2×	2,288×	234.0×	2,476×	10.26×	—	0.46%	0.04%	—	8.2%
5	TRONTRX	$30.90B	97.2×	97.2×	97.2×	97.2×	5.81×	—	1.03%	1.03%	—	0.0%
6	HyperliquidHYPE	$18.24B	912.4×	912.4×	3,919×	3,919×	12.10×	—	0.11%	0.11%	—	329.5%
7	DogecoinDOGE	$12.87B	48,971×	—	48,971×	—	7,693×	—	0.00%	—	—	0.0%
8	CardanoADA	$7.67B	15,906×	79,524×	19,085×	95,418×	120.58×	—	0.01%	0.00%	—	20.0%
9	Bitcoin CashBCH	$4.96B	—	—	—	—	14,166×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
10	CantonCC	$4.42B	7.6×	7.6×	7.6×	7.6×	549.07×	—	13.24%	13.24%	—	0.0%
11	LitecoinLTC	$3.89B	27,380×	—	27,380×	—	4,999×	—	0.00%	—	—	0.0%
12	Gram (prev. Toncoin)GRAM	$3.71B	3,511×	7,021×	6,622×	13,244×	74.69×	—	0.03%	0.01%	—	88.6%
13	HederaHBAR	$3.32B	—	—	—	—	125.43×	—	—	—	—	14.1%
14	SuiSUI	$3.14B	2,485×	6,972×	6,066×	17,018×	6.65×	—	0.04%	0.01%	—	144.1%
15	AvalancheAVAX	$3.14B	2,458×	2,458×	2,639×	2,639×	6.61×	—	0.04%	0.04%	—	7.3%
16	BittensorTAO	$2.09B	—	—	—	—	46.35×	—	—	—	—	118.8%
17	Internet ComputerICP	$1.38B	758.5×	984.7×	758.5×	984.7×	98.63×	—	0.13%	0.10%	—	0.0%
18	WorldcoinWLD	$1.34B	5,830×	—	16,065×	—	40.73×	$232,591	0.02%	—	—	175.5%
19	Ethereum ClassicETC	$1.16B	168,063×	—	168,063×	—	10,291×	—	0.00%	—	—	0.0%
20	Cosmos HubATOM	$770.04M	40,600×	—	40,601×	—	7,142×	—	0.00%	—	—	0.0%
21	StableSTABLE	$742.33M	—	—	—	—	25.80×	—	—	—	—	285.4%
22	FilecoinFIL	$663.99M	1,343×	1,343×	3,160×	3,160×	252.61×	—	0.07%	0.07%	—	135.3%
23	FlareFLR	$584.91M	1,422×	—	1,744×	—	4.44×	—	0.07%	—	—	22.7%
24	VeChainVET	$561.21M	—	—	—	—	468.58×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
25	DashDASH	$543.39M	98,492×	—	98,500×	—	7,450×	—	0.00%	—	—	0.0%
26	AptosAPT	$508.29M	449.4×	449.4×	632.5×	632.5×	8.62×	—	0.22%	0.22%	—	40.7%
27	LayerZeroZRO	$378.72M	278.8×	227.0×	789.2×	642.4×	0.05×	—	0.36%	0.44%	0.44%	183.0%
28	SeiSEI	$330.58M	47,414×	47,414×	70,417×	70,417×	9.94×	—	0.00%	0.00%	—	48.5%
29	GnosisGNO	$302.31M	3,251×	—	3,695×	—	3.00×	—	0.03%	—	—	13.7%
30	MonadMON	$297.35M	74.9×	93.2×	637.8×	793.5×	0.32×	—	1.33%	1.07%	—	751.4%
31	Terra Luna ClassicLUNC	$283.16M	—	—	—	—	475.90×	—	—	—	—	16.8%
32	ConfluxCFX	$252.13M	—	—	—	—	33.74×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
33	TezosXTZ	$238.33M	2,314×	2,612×	2,357×	2,659×	12.34×	—	0.04%	0.04%	—	1.8%
34	PlasmaXPL	$236.57M	1,911×	1,911×	6,881×	6,881×	0.40×	—	0.05%	0.05%	—	260.0%
35	KaiaKAIA	$186.79M	7,587×	8,521×	7,588×	8,522×	20.19×	—	0.01%	0.01%	—	0.0%
36	IOTAIOTA	$183.51M	—	—	—	—	125.19×	—	—	—	—	7.5%
37	The GraphGRT	$181.42M	646.9×	—	686.6×	—	—	—	0.15%	—	—	6.1%
38	Theta NetworkTHETA	$168.63M	—	—	—	—	566.99×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
39	THORChainRUNE	$156.27M	3,249×	3,249×	3,497×	3,497×	5.43×	—	0.03%	0.03%	—	7.6%
40	MultiversXEGLD	$150.53M	5,461×	—	5,461×	—	10.88×	—	0.02%	—	—	0.0%
41	NEONEO	$143.60M	—	—	—	—	120.84×	—	—	—	—	41.8%
42	ChilizCHZ	$141.10M	7,596×	—	7,596×	—	73.91×	—	0.01%	—	—	0.0%
43	ApeCoinAPE	$134.52M	858.8×	—	858.8×	—	49.26×	—	0.12%	—	—	0.0%
44	SonicS	$103.74M	3,614×	3,614×	3,614×	3,614×	6.70×	—	0.03%	0.03%	—	0.0%
45	WEMIXWEMIX	$99.65M	—	—	—	—	33.75×	—	—	—	—	12.2%
46	dYdXDYDX	$93.57M	—	—	—	—	1.33×	—	—	—	—	13.3%
47	GALAGALA	$87.73M	—	—	—	—	21.49×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
48	BeamBEAM	$79.44M	—	—	—	—	83.14×	—	0.00%	—	—	14.0%
49	XPR NetworkXPR	$79.43M	—	—	—	—	1.59×	—	—	—	—	13.0%
50	SuperVerseSUPER	$68.48M	—	—	—	—	3,072×	—	—	—	—	56.2%
51	Data NetworkDATA	$68.42M	51.4×	—	148.0×	—	1,786×	—	1.95%	—	—	188.0%
52	QubicQUBIC	$60.22M	—	—	—	—	1,141×	—	—	—	—	24.5%
53	BerachainBERA	$56.72M	1,841×	1,841×	3,221×	3,221×	1.65×	—	0.05%	0.05%	—	75.0%
54	PharosPROS	$54.93M	—	—	—	—	1.96×	—	—	—	—	637.5%
55	peaqPEAQ	$54.88M	—	—	—	—	85.82×	—	0.00%	—	—	78.1%
56	ZetaChainZETA	$54.60M	—	—	—	—	176.88×	—	0.00%	—	—	30.7%
57	aelfELF	$53.20M	3,724×	37,110×	4,511×	44,946×	10.77×	—	0.03%	0.00%	—	21.1%
58	OntologyONT	$52.74M	—	—	—	—	10.66×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
59	KavaKAVA	$52.72M	—	—	—	—	2.56×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
60	ZilliqaZIL	$51.47M	—	—	—	—	141.23×	—	0.00%	—	—	5.4%
61	ZIGChainZIG	$50.86M	—	—	—	—	16.07×	—	—	—	—	38.7%
62	OasisROSE	$49.75M	—	—	—	—	233.29×	—	—	—	—	26.1%
63	HydrationHDX	$47.39M	12,009×	—	13,034×	—	0.83×	—	0.01%	—	—	8.5%
64	FlowFLOW	$46.10M	14,472×	—	14,472×	—	3.62×	—	0.01%	—	—	0.0%
65	Ontology GasONG	$45.75M	—	—	—	—	36,739×	—	—	—	—	66.8%
66	Versatize CoinVTCN	$43.23M	—	—	—	—	115.19×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
67	KUB CoinKUB	$41.87M	1,203×	—	1,919×	—	7.45×	—	0.08%	—	—	59.5%
68	0G0G	$39.40M	—	—	—	—	13.30×	—	—	—	—	369.0%
69	Rocket PoolRPL	$36.22M	0.9×	—	0.9×	—	0.03×	—	107.50%	—	—	0.0%
70	CoreCORE	$30.49M	8,628×	8,628×	12,188×	12,188×	6.65×	—	0.01%	0.01%	—	41.3%
71	EthereumPoWETHW	$28.33M	—	—	—	—	2,518×	—	—	—	—	0.0%
72	CoinExCET	$27.65M	—	—	—	—	151.53×	—	0.00%	—	—	0.0%
73	VanaVANA	$27.27M	—	—	—	—	130.36×	—	0.00%	—	—	289.6%
74	ChiaXCH	$26.68M	2,423×	—	4,521×	—	137.15×	—	0.04%	—	—	86.6%
75	OsmosisOSMO	$26.48M	844.7×	—	1,046×	—	2.01×	—	0.12%	—	—	23.8%
76	FogoFOGO	$25.87M	—	—	—	—	27.62×	—	—	—	—	169.4%

基于过去 30 天滚动年化；市值为即时数据 site calculation from CoinGecko and DeFiLlama inputs observed 02 Sep 2026 06:59 UTC

每项比率的含义及其失效之处

Market Cap / Annualized Fees Compares a token's market value with the fees users paid to the network over a year. Providers disagree on what a fee is: priority tips and maximal extractable value are counted by some and excluded by others, and front-end interface fees taken by a separate company are usually invisible entirely. Assets that charge almost… annualized from trailing 30 days

Market Cap / Annualized Revenue Market value divided by the share of yearly fees the protocol keeps rather than paying out. The split between fees and revenue is a modeling choice, not an observation, and providers draw it in different places for the same protocol, so two reputable sites can differ by a multiple on the same token. The cost of earning that… annualized from trailing 30 days

FDV / Annualized Fees Like the market cap version, but values every token that will ever exist at today's price. There is no single definition of fully diluted supply: some providers use the coded maximum, some use current total supply, and some use supply after all published vesting completes, so the same token can carry three different FDVs. Assets… annualized from trailing 30 days

FDV / Annualized Revenue Fully diluted market value divided by the yearly fee income the protocol retains. Both inputs are estimates, so the errors compound: a provider that defines fully diluted supply generously and revenue narrowly will report a multiple several times another provider's for the identical protocol. Projects still distributing… annualized from trailing 30 days

Market Cap / TVL Compares a token's market value with the value of assets currently deposited in its contracts. Total value locked double-counts routinely: ether staked through a liquid staking provider produces a receipt token, which is deposited into a lending market, borrowed against, and redeposited, and each leg can be counted. Because it is… point-in-time

FDV / TVL Fully diluted market value divided by the value of assets deposited in the protocol. It inherits every problem of both inputs at once: recursive double-counting in deposits and an undefined or provider-specific diluted supply. Protocols that attracted deposits with token emissions are the common case here, and those same… point-in-time

Market Cap per Active Address Market value divided by the number of addresses that sent or received anything recently. Addresses are not users in either direction: one person can generate an unlimited number of addresses for free, while a single exchange deposit address can serve millions of customers whose trades never touch the chain. Rollups, batching… point-in-time value over trailing 30 days of activity

Fee Yield Total yearly fees paid by users, expressed as a percentage of the token's market value. Gross fees include amounts that never accrue to the protocol or to token holders in any form, so a high figure can coexist with a protocol that retains nothing. Fees paid to validators or liquidity providers are compensation for a cost… annualized from trailing 30 days

Network Revenue Yield Yearly protocol revenue expressed as a percentage of the token's market value. Nothing is distributed in the great majority of cases, so the figure describes revenue that stays with a treasury, with validators, or is destroyed by a burn mechanism rather than paid out. Where value does reach holders it arrives as… annualized from trailing 30 days

Holder Revenue Yield The share of fee income that actually reaches token holders, as a percentage of market value. A burn reaches holders only as a proportional supply reduction, and it can be entirely offset by issuance elsewhere in the same protocol, which this figure does not net off. Fee distributions to stakers are received only by tokens that are… annualized from trailing 30 days

Dilution overhang How much larger fully diluted valuation is than market capitalization. Fully diluted valuation prices tokens that do not yet trade at the price of tokens that do, which is an assumption, not a measurement. For assets with very long emission schedules the arithmetic is close to meaningless. point-in-time

NVT (Network Value to Transactions) Network value divided by the daily value moved on-chain, smoothed over about three months. The denominator counts change outputs, self-transfers, and exchange rebalancing as settlement, and the adjustment heuristics used to remove them differ enough between providers that NVT values from two sites are not comparable. The measure… point-in-time value over a smoothed 90-day denominator

估值比率

每项比率的含义及其失效之处

资产

基本面

Valuation & risk

机构

学习

关于

法律